At Lumix, we never understood why ediscovery tools were so complicated. We know the nature of legal reviews can be complex, but kept asking ourselves, “Shouldn’t the tools designed for review be intuitive and actually simplify the process?”
We thought so, and decided to make that our mission.
Learn MoreWe get it.
We’ve put a lot of sweat into research and developing Lumix so it includes the latest advances in A.I. and automation, but is still easy to navigate. This meant making sure that none of our code was outsourced. Lumix was built entirely by us from our Phoenix HQ.
In the early 2000s, eDiscovery was still the Wild West. Before the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended in 2006 to address eDiscovery in the wake of the Zubulake cases (with opinions from 2003 to 2005), and even afterward, few, if any, clear standards existed governing the use of electronically stored information (ESI) in …
Read More
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) requires parties to litigation to meet-and-confer early in a case—the rule’s language specifies “as soon as practicable,” absent a court order, and at least 21 days before the court holds a scheduling conference or before the Rule 16(b) scheduling order is due. Rule 26(f) imposes a number of responsibilities …
Read More
Artificial intelligence (AI) is permeating every aspect of our lives: it’s telling us what to buy and when we need to buy it, when we need to get up from our desk to take some steps, which emails to read using filtering techniques, and what to watch next on our smart device or TV. While …
Read More
One week you’re handling a tiny eDiscovery matter with 5 gigabytes of data for review. The next, you’re swimming in a case with a terabyte of data (that’s roughly 35 million pages!). No matter the size of the case, you need a scalable review platform, team, and workflow that can flex to handle a deluge …
Read More
